It is an everyday dilemma – whether to plunk down cash or plastic for a new outfit or a car, a washing machine, a dinner out, perhaps a holiday. Plastic postpones the moment of reckoning until the bill comes due. But the dilemma is more than the rational one of whether you really need the new appliance or a meal somebody else cooks.
It is about splurging to buy an outfit that confirms or changes your identity or hoarding old clothes for fear of not being able to buy other things in future. The problem is that it is hard and often impossible to detach the emotion from the purpose of spending and to separate the rational part of spending on genuine needs such a home from the anticipated pleasure of a holiday. The former is a durable good that will provide service for decades. The latter lasts not much longer than a tan.
Scott Hannah sees the wreckage of wrong decisions. President of the Credit Counseling Society, a national non-profit organization based in Vancouver that helps people find solutions to their financial problems, he sees the spend or save dilemma as a reflection of two problems – omnipresent marketing and low interest rates. One, marketing and the manipulation of buyer psychology by advertising, appeals to emotions. The other, the fact that money saved in cash returns little before inflation and less than nothing after, is an incentive to spend.
“We live in a society so heavily marketed in the media that there is a rush to keep up with everyone else,” Mr. Hannah explains. “Then add in the fact that the one asset that people can buy and use well that may appreciate – a home – is often out of reach and it becomes rational in a way to spend money on what one can afford.”
What’s new in Canada’s consumer boom is the easing of guilt about spending.
Of course, a core of consumers remain wedded to an older feeling that thrift is good and spending is bad. Those on fixed incomes may fear running out of money and so tumble into a vortex of hoarding cash and old products for fear of poverty. It is distinctly if not uniquely a problem of the elderly, says Derek Moran, head of Smarter Financial Planning Ltd. in Kelowna, B.C. “My mother and father get a feeling of discomfort from shopping. They are traditionalists who find it hard to reverse the belief that one should always spend less than one earns.”
The problem is cash myopia – insecurity and a desire for liquidity often go together
There are rational ways to allocate money and to exclude most of emotion from the process. Setting up a budget and living within it means that, down the road, there won’t be a surprise when payments for pleasures bought long ago come due to be paid. “You want to avoid buyer’s remorse,” Mr. Hannah says. The solution, of course, is to practice anticipation – the essence and the purpose of budgeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment